
Interview
Judging Arabic type without a house style
A panel of one taste is the fastest way to make an award worthless.
2 min read
Media centre
What the programme is doing, what the jury is thinking, and what the winners actually did.
48 posts

Interview
A panel of one taste is the fastest way to make an award worthless.
2 min read

Article
The archive is public. A jury will read a resubmission as a resubmission.
2 min read

Article
Not a fourth level, and not a comment on the entries that did compete.
2 min read

Event
Every placed project, printed at size, for two weeks.
2 min read

Event
Every juror, the categories they take, and why each one was asked.
2 min read

Interview
The Mizan team on why the mark had to measure rather than illustrate.
2 min read

Event
Bring one project. Two jurors read it against the published criteria, out loud.
2 min read

Interview
Most entries are finished. Fewer are resolved, and the criteria can tell.
2 min read

Interview
The founding member on why a jury of one taste is the fastest way to make an award worthless.
2 min read

Article
Regional production constraints are real, and jurors are told to account for them.
2 min read

Interview
A student ranked against agencies is not a competition. Admin walks through the paperwork.
2 min read

Article
The criteria are read in a fixed order. Public votes are not part of it.
2 min read
Entry windows, jury announcements and results. A few times a year, nothing else.